"Moshiach is ready to come now-our part is to increase in acts of goodness and kindness" -The Rebbe

Showing posts with label love among chassidim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label love among chassidim. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2011

Why No New Rebbe?


Why No New Rebbe?

Rabbi Yehoishophot Oliver

Some ask: Why hasn’t the Chabad movement appointed a new Rebbe?

One answer is that in the case of the previous Chabad Rebbes, even when the successor was not immediately known, the predecessor dropped 
various hints about the successor’s identity. In contrast, the Rebbe explicitly prepared chassidim for the event of his histalkus by issuing a public will (see here), in which not only did he not indicate that the Chabad movement would be led by another Rebbe after the Rebbe’s histalkus, but on the contrary, he instructed that it be led by the Chabad Rabbonim of each community, whom the Rebbe declared were to be akin to Yehoshua who succeeded Moshe Rabeinu.

Moreover, on an earlier occasion, the Rebbe alluded to the possible scenario of his histalkus, and instructed chassidim how to act in such a situation by relating the following story of the Tzemach Tzedek.[1]

Once, the Tzemach Tzedek was summoned to a rabbinic conference called by the secular authorities. At this conference he vehemently opposed the “reforms” in Jewish education that the anti-religious Haskalah movement was pressing the government to mandate, and in so doing he endangered his life many times.

His colleague at the conference, Reb Itche Volozhin, confronted him: “How can you permit yourself to risk your life—what will be with the community [if you lose your life,  G–d forbid]?” The Tzemach Tzedek responded: “This question can be answered in two ways: First, there are the children [who can succeed me]. [They were holy in their own right, and most of them indeed went on to take the mantle of Rebbe after the Tzemach Tzedek’s histalkus.] Second, the unity among chassidim will lead them toward Moshiach.”
The Rebbe quoted this story in 5726 (1966), and commented:[2]
Now that it is the hundredth year after the histalkus [of the Tzemach Tzedek], and now there are also no children, the solution is for chassidim to unite, and in this way they will carry it out. ... The unity among chassidim nullifies all decrees and negative things, breaks through all boundaries, and elicits the truth of Havayeh [transcendent G–dliness] until it reaches here, in the world.
The Rebbe was clearly intimating (and twenty-eight years in advance!) that since in the scenario of his histalkus, G–d forbid, there would be no successor, the solution to the absence of his physical leadership will lie in the Tzemach Tzedek’s second response—unity among chassidim. Here, too, the Rebbe clearly indicated that he would have no successor, and instructed chassidim how to approach this scenario.

Yet although there is no successor, this is not to say that the Rebbe no longer leads us, chas veshalom. Rather, what the Tzemach Tzedek meant to say was that through unity among themselves, chassidim would be able to overcome his physical absence. But he would still be spiritually present with his chassidim just as before. We see this principle in the Rebbe’s words concerning the Previous Rebbe after Yud Shevat:
People ask questions concerning histalkus [i.e., how can the Previous Rebbe continue to lead us after his histalkus]. We find that the Talmud Yerushalmi[3] says of Shimshon:

In one verse it is written, “He [Shimshon] judged the Jewish people for forty years” while in another verse it is written, “He judged the Jewish people for twenty years.”[4] ... This indicates that ... they were in fear of him for twenty years after his passing in the way that they were in fear of him for twenty years during his lifetime.
In other words, Shimshon’s leadership and rule continued even after passing, for the Jewish people were “in fear of him” [i.e., inspired by him to serve Hashem] for another twenty years; thus, it is considered as if he had judged the Jewish people for forty years.

If this is true of a Shofet, it is certainly so with regard to a Rebbe, since the entire being of a Rebbe is the soul-level of Yechidah [regarding this level of the soul, see here], and he elicits this level into every section of his soul and of his body. With respect to the level of Yechidah, the event of a histalkus has much less relevance. Thus, it is absolutely certain that a Rebbe can continue to lead even after his histalkus, just as he did during his lifetime.

There are certain areas in regard to which the histalkus makes a difference. However, in other areas [nothing has changed]. Just as things were run until now—two, three, four years ago, and earlier—with supernatural success, because the Rebbe was in charge, so, too, from now on. The Rebbe is in charge, and is running all matters. ...

Thus, just as until now, in all areas [of his activities], there was tremendous, supernatural success, so will it be in the future, a time when “He is present [in the world] ... [even] more than during his lifetime.”[5]

Thus, the choice given us is that we have the privilege to join him in the areas under his leadership.

It is certain that all activities will continue as before. And just as every living thing [constantly grows, his activities] will conform to the principle that “One should always rise higher in holiness,”[6] in an ever-growing and expanding manner. ... The Rebbe gave, gives, and will give the opportunity to everyone to take part in these activities.

He also promised that participating in his activities will bring blessings in children, health, and livelihood.


Toras Menachem 5711, Vol. 2, pp. 186-187.
So the Rebbe teaches clearly that a Rebbe never leaves his chassidim, and continues to lead them even after his histalkus just as before. This principle surely applies to the Rebbe himself (especially according to the principle that the Rebbe himself taught us on many occasions that “he rules concerning himself,” explained here).

Another reason that the Chabad movement will not appoint a new Rebbe is that the Rebbe clearly defined the “mission statement” for his generation in the very first Ma’amar that he delivered, Basi Legani. Our task is to draw the Shechinah [divine presence] down into the world, with the actual coming of Moshiach (see here). Or, as the Rebbe put it in more recent years, “This generation is the last generation of exile and the first generation of redemption.”[7] Since, to state the obvious, Moshiach is yet to come, the Rebbe’s role as Leader of the Generation surely continues. 

Moreover, the tremendous, ongoing, ever-growing success, kein ayin hara, that the Rebbe’s chassidim and shluchim have had in spreading Yiddishkeit and Chassidus worldwide despite the Rebbe’s physical absence attests tangibly and powerfully to the Rebbe’s ongoing leadership.

Finally, a word must be said, with all due respect, about the questioner. What I will explain also accounts for the fact that it is typically non-Chabad chassidim who (often with well-meaning intentions) pose this question. The very question reveals a total lack of understanding (usually not the questioner’s fault) about the concept of a Rebbe, especially as explained in Chabad teachings (for more on this topic, see here).

A Chabad Rebbe is not a glorified CEO of a company, a figurehead, and a charismatic leader. He is (and this is completely not doing justice to the concept) a truly holy person. Moreover, not only does he fit the Tanya’s definition of a Tzaddik gamur—one who is completely pure, and not only has no evil inclination, but derives no pleasure from anything worldly, and even finds physical delights abhorrent[8]—but he is a Rebbe, which means far, far more. Just one example of just how lofty is the level of a Rebbe was mentioned above, “The entire being of a Rebbe is the soul-level of Yechidah, and he elicits this level into every section of his soul and of his body.”[9]

Since, on account of the “decline of the generations,” truly holy people are not around anymore, never mind people of the caliber of a Chabad Rebbe, choosing a regular person, even a great scholar who is a very refined, inspired person, and declaring him Rebbe would be utterly absurd. It would be akin to declaring a chicken a person, and expecting it to manage a company. This would obviously make a farce of the entire concept of a Rebbe, and would in any case fail miserably. This is nicely put by the response of Reb Zalman Marozov sheyicheh to a distinguished rabbi who posed this question to him: “In Russia, we had a very hard time obtaining an esrog. We would have to go to great lengths and spend exorbitant sums of money, and the whole town would share the use of one esrog. And yet no one thought to ‘solve’ the problem by simply taking a lemon and declaring it an esrog ...



_____________________________________________
[1] Sefer HaMa’amarim Admur HaRayatz 5711, p. 245.
[2] Sicha of 13 Nissan, 5726.
[3] Sotah 1:8. Cf. Yalkut Shimoni, Shoftim 71.
[4] Shoftim 16:31.
[5] Zohar 3:71b. Cf. Tanya, Igeres HaKodesh, explanation to epistle 27.
[6] Berachos 28a.
[7] Sefer HaSichos 5750, Vol. 1, p. 158.
[8] See Tanya ch. 10.
[9] This also ties in with the Rebbe’s statements that the Chabad Rebbeim were the “Moshiach of the generation,” because Moshiach is particularly associated with the soul-level of Yechidah (Ramaz on Zohar 2:40b).


Dedicated in the merit of a speedy release for the captives Yonasan ben Malka (Jonathan Pollard) and Sholom Mordechai Halevi ben Rivka (Sholom Rubashkin).



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Like what you read? The articles I write take a lot of time and effort. Please contact me to sponsor an article for (at least) $36 in honor of the birthday, wedding anniversary, or yarhtzeit of a loved one, or for a refuah shleimah or the like. Also, see here concerning the tremendous merit of supporting the dissemination of Chassidus, and the blessings that one receives for doing so.

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Why did the Alter Rebbe go to prison?


Why did the Alter Rebbe go to prison?

Rabbi Y. Oliver

The Previous Rebbe related:
The Mitteler Rebbe said: The Alter Rebbe consented to being taken to prison because he wanted to test the brotherly love of the chassidim, [to see] how they would take his imprisonment [another version: “how chassidim would feel his imprisonment”]. ...

The Rebbe Rashab explained this as follows: A Jewish leader [lit. “shepherd”] needs to know the state of his followers [lit. “flock”], and once the Alter Rebbe would learn that his
chassidim are lacking in brotherly love, he would be able to correct this situation, and in order to complete his task of rectifying his flock, it was worthwhile for him to endanger himself!


Sefer HaSichos 5696-Choref 5700, pp. 208-209.
In my own words: As discussed earlier, a chossid relates to his Rebbe like a son relates to a father; it follows that a chossid should relate to fellow chassidim with the same love one has for siblings.

However, in an ordinary setting, the routine of daily life will often conceal a deeply-felt love, even a love between blood siblings. So in order to test the true strength of the love between
chassidim, the Alter Rebbe wanted them to be thrust into circumstances in which such love typically comes to the fore. Just as when a father is in danger, his children unite to do whatever possible to rescue him, so did the Alter Rebbe hope that when he would be imprisoned, the chassidim would unite with brotherly love with the goal of rescuing him. If they would not, this would indicate that they lacked the quality of brotherly love, and he would know to take the necessary steps to rectify it upon his release. It was so important for the Alter Rebbe to ensure that the chassidim felt true brotherly love for one another that he decided that it was warranted to endanger his life for this purpose.

We have been taught that everything that happens to a Rebbe takes place with his consent (
Likkutei Dibburim, Vol. 1 p. 89). So although Hashem put the Alter Rebbe in circumstances in which he would be arrested, the Alter Rebbe chose to allow that process to take its course. Likewise, it follows that on a certain level the Rebbe agreed to be concealed from us through his histalkus on Gimmel Tammuz.

Likewise, it is reasonable to infer that just as in prison the Alter Rebbe concealed himself from his
chassidim with the intention of establishing the degree of brotherly love between the chassidim, so is it with us after Gimmel Tammuz: at least one way of explaining our current situation is that Hashem and the Rebbe are testing our love for our fellow chassidim
.

However, it should also be pointed out that the Previous Rebbe mentions that the Alter Rebbe agreed to be arrested in order to see how the
chassidim “would take his imprisonment” or how they would “feel his imprisonment.” Either way, this expression implies that the ordeal of the Alter Rebbe’s imprisonment was also meant to test the depth of the commitment and Hiskashrus (bond) between the chassidim and the Alter Rebbe. Perhaps we can therefore also infer from this that in our situation as well, our Hiskashrus is being tested.

These two ideas—testing the bond of the
chassidim with one another, and of the chassidim with the Rebbe—are interdependent, for, as mentioned, only by truly realizing that “we are all children of one father” can true bonding between chassidim take place.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Literally like one family


As discussed earlier, a chossid should feel a very deep, personal bond with fellow chassidim, to the extent that he relates to another chossid just as one relates to another family member. On this note, the Frierdiker Rebbe related:
The Rebbe Maharash said to my father, the Rebbe [Rashab], that the Alter Rebbe sacrificed his holy life and invested tremendous energies with the intention of bringing the community of chassidim to become literally like one family. Every single member of the community of chassidim should seek the welfare of his fellow in matters of livelihood, and whenever one helps another, he should do so with a feeling of great love and affection, to the extent felt by those who are literally members of one family.


Igros Kodesh Admur HaRayatz, Vol. 4, p. 34.
Elsewhere (see Hayom Yom of 24 Tishrei) it is written that one fosters love for one’s fellow chossid through the means of a farbrengen. But this requires explanation, for this only tells us that a farbrengen is the medium through which this feeling is created and developed, but how is it then expressed? Or, put differently, how can one discern whether one has indeed attained a true feeling of love for other chassidim?

The above
sicha explains this: A chossid expresses his love for a fellow chossid by genuinely caring for his gashmiyus (material needs), and doing him material favors whenever possible—helping him out with a loan, with advice on which house to buy, or by simply inquiring how his livelihood is going (“vos macht men in parnoso”), and being genuinely interested and ready to assist however possible.
How necessary is it for a
chossid to feel this way? The Rebbe Rashab taught that a chossid who lacks this feeling is spiritually deformed:
For chassidim, love for one’s fellow [chassidim] is [according to another version: “should be”] first nature, not second nature. A chossid who lacks love for his fellow [chossid] is just as deformed as one born missing a hand or a foot.



Sefer HaSichos 5696-Choref 5700, p. 209.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Tragedies (lo aleinu): A Goad to Teshuvah


Reizi Rodal, 10, ע”ה
Moshe Golan, 17, ע”ה
Yanatan Bitton, 17, ע”ה
Levi Hendel, 14, ע”ה
Toby Eagle, 21, ע”ה
Zev Simons, ע”ה
Rochel Simons, 48, ע”ה
Gavriel Noach Holtzberg, 29, הי”ד
Rivka Holtzberg, 29, הי”ד
Yisroel Noach Tzfasman, 24, ע”ה
Rochie Paley, 26, ע”ה
Pesha Leah Azoulay, 20, ע”ה
Chana (Raskin) Wolvovsky, 21, ע”ה
Avrohom Dovid Liberow, 9, ע”ה
Refael Peretz Rivkin, 6, ע”ה
Chaya Mushka Itkin, 3, ע”ה
Shula Swerdlov, 3, ע”ה
Devorie Neuwirth, 41, ע”ה
Rafael Miriashvilli, 25, הי”ד
Revital Efrat Maudah, 35, ע”ה
Menachem Mendel Sadon, 15, ע”ה
Chaya Mushka Ashkenazi, 7, ע”ה
Chaya Gottlieb, 24, ע”ה
Menachem Mendel Browd, 7m, ע”ה
Shloime'le Zaltzman, 7m, ע”ה
Yossi Kadosh, 7, ע”ה
Levi Wolowik, 9, ע”ה
Yossel Tevel, 55, ע”ה
Avrohom Goldstein, 53, ע”ה
Aryeh Leib Misenzon, 25, הי”ד
Nosson Deitsch, 21, ע”ה
Zlata Geisinsky, 49, ע”ה
Chana Weinfeld, 10, ע”ה
Esty Cohen, 33, ע”ה
Yossi Kreiman, 23, ע”ה
Mendy Deren, 36, ע”ה
Levi Deitsch, 34, ע”ה
Shalom Dovber Gerber, 2, ע”ה
Menachem Mendel Orenstein, 45, ע”ה
Menucha Rachel Vaspi, 1, ע”ה
Chaya Kurkus, 47, ע”ה
Hendel Keller, 34, ע”ה
Paz Shusterman, 37, ע”ה

Mochai Schapiro, 35, ע”ה
Chaya Mushka Hershkowitz, 23, ע”ה
Kazi (Kasriel) Benjamin, 25, ע”ה
Shayna Borevitz, 18, ע”ה
Rivka Mas’hid, 17, ע”ה
Stacey Brook, 17, ע”ה
Rivka Durai, 18, ע”ה 

Moshe Abelsky, 49, ע”ה
No’a Basya Lazarus, 1, ע”ה
Menachem Mendel Oberlander, 20, ע”ה
Yehuda Groden, 23, ע”ה
Yosef Yitzchak Tarlow, 28, ע”ה
Yaacov Shlomo Pellin, 31, ע”ה

Shula Friedman, 42, ע”ה
Dorit Giro, 45,
 ע”ה
Draizel Merka Altman, 53, ע”ה
Aharon Stawsky, 50, ע”ה

Mira Sharf, 25, הי”ד
Ahron Smadga, 50
, הי”ד 
Shneur Zalman Greenberg, 4m, ע”ה
Yossi Alexandre, 19, ע”ה
Nava Rus Chein, 2, ע”ה 
Sara Leah Overlander, 53, ע”ה 
Alter Hirshel Dovid Strauss, 3m, ע”ה
Mendy Avrahami, 23, ע”ה
Chana Ohana, 18, ע”הZev Aryeh Glick, 22m, ע”ה
Yossi Kadosh, 7, ע”ה
Yisroel Bodner, 18 m., ע”ה

Nochum Tzvi Potash, 8, ע”ה
Shoshana Rachel Stern, 12, 
Levi Nemon, 21m., ע”ה 
Miriam Baila Goldsweig, 6m, ע”ה
Yosef Raksin, 60, 
הי”ד

We are, yet again, reeling from recent tragedies in the Chabad community. Boruch Dayan Emes.

The various communities of Chabad
chassidim are not separate and independent entities, chas v’shalom. Rather, there is a worldwide Chabad community of which each and every individual community is an integral part. Thus, everything that happens in one community affects all the others, whether for the good or otherwise.

Obviously, any tragedy that befalls a fellow Jew should touch all Jews deeply. But one should feel affected all the more when tragedy befalls a member of one’s own community. This concept is alluded to in the HaYom Yom of 3 Adar 1, which teaches that one should love every Jew, even one whom one has never met—but all the more so a member of one’s own community (see also here concerning the concept that a chossid should feel an extra love for fellow chassidim).


The tragedies in families of Anash, may Hashem save us, are now no longer unusual. They have been recurring every few months now for a number of years, with chilling regularity. There is an unmistakable pattern here, and it begs the question: Without getting into the larger topic of why the innocent and righteous suffer, why evil exists, and so on, how should we respond?

There is a popular notion that associating suffering with sin is
inherently antithetical to the path of Chassidus. 


This is part of a general misconception that since Chassidus focuses on ahavas Yisrael, positive energy, joy, looking at one’s fellow Jew with a good eye, and so on—which I do not question—anything and everything that smacks of negativity is necessarily wrong and inherently un-Chassidic.

However, this is a complete mistake, for, as Chassidus teaches, kindness must always be balanced with strictness, and sometimes rebuke and harshness are necessary, albeit in carefully-measured doses. Rather, the Chassidic way is not to become preoccupied with the negative approach in avodah—not that it be neglected altogether.


In any case, as far as the topic of tragedy is concerned, in an undisputed ruling, the Rambam writes:

It is a positive obligation stated in the Torah to cry out to Hashem in prayer whenever a great calamity should befall the community. … This is counted among the paths of repentance, that when a calamity arrives and people cry out and sound the Shofar, everyone will know that it was because of their wrongdoing that this evil befell them … and this will cause the calamity to be removed from them. If, however, they do not cry out … arguing instead that this event happened to us as part of the natural way of the world and that the calamity happened by chance, this approach is cruel, because it causes people to persist in their wrongdoing and thus brings about further disasters … . Moreover, the Sages ordained that people should fast over every calamity that overtakes the community, until Heaven shows them compassion.

Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Ta’aniyos, 1:1-4.
The Rambam’s words are clear. When suffering occurs, the community as a whole, and each and every individual, ought to feel that it occurred on account of their wicked behavior, as a punishment for it, and that it is as a sign from Hashem that they must do teshuvah. This attitude is in fact a kindness for the community, for teshuvah will correct the cause of the tragedy, namely their sins, and thereby save them from the terrible result of ongoing sin—further punishment, G–d forbid.

This is also reflected in the story of Purim. The Rebbe (
Likkutei Sichos, Vol. 6, p. 192) uses the above halacha to explain Esther
’s behavior. As soon as she learned of Haman’s decree, she declared that it had in fact been caused by their sins, and called the people to fast and do teshuvah. They heeded her call, and this was the true reason that the decree was averted.

The calamities that we face are the tragedies that have been taking the lives of beloved members of our community, may Hashem save us. According to the Rambam’s ruling, it emerges that the Chabad community as a whole, and every individual chossid in particular, should feel personally responsible for these shocking events.

Moreover, in the above sicha, the Rebbe explains that in her call for teshuvah, Esther even made a point of identifying which particular sin had caused the decree (viz., taking part in the meal of Achashverosh). This appears to demonstrate that in the process of communal teshuvah, the leaders are tasked with drawing the community’s attention to rampant and/or blatant sins that are most likely the cause of the suffering that has befallen the community.

I will not presume to engage in such speculation, as I am not of that caliber. However, I would humbly suggest that our Rabbonim—the true leaders of every Jewish community, especially in light of the Rebbe’s public will discussed here—are the ones fit to make such statements, and if they have not, in my humble opinion, they should be urged to do so.

In addition to the communal reckoning, since a community consists of a conglomeration of numerous individuals, when such events occur, each individual should also conduct a personal accounting, searching carefully within for faults that he or she may have, with the goal of correcting them and thereby safeguarding the community as a whole from such disasters in the future, chas v’shalom.

Most importantly, such teshuvah prepares us for and hastens the arrival of Moshiach now.

May we be comforted for our irreplaceable losses, and know no more sorrow.


______________

ETA: The quote below, from the Previous Rebbe here, is also highly relevant:
Every salvation comes in the wake of a time of distress, and every distress that strikes the Jewish people comes as a punishment for particular transgressions. That is to say: When Jews repent, G-d sends His salvation. His help not only removes the punishment: it also brings them a salvation [beyond that]. It goes without saying that the tribulations inflicted in punishment are proportionate to the transgressions, and the good fortune brought about by the salvation is proportionate to the repentance.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Chassidishe Friendship



In a letter dated 14 Sivan 5697 (1927, which was also the day before the Previous Rebbe was captured by the Soviets) Reb Rafael Nachman Kahn, then living in Europe, writes to his comrade from Tomchei Temimim (the Lubavitcher Yeshiva) Reb Yisroel Jacobson, who had immigrated to the US:
How are you, my brother? I take it that the spirit of America has not yet entered you, and you still recall the way you were just as if you were here. However, I feel for you, for your loneliness, that you don’t have those companions and friends that you had here. Before your journey we discussed this, and agreed to write to each other, so that at least we would communicate by correspondence.

Zikaron Livnei Yisrael, p. 123.
This letter is so beautiful. It expresses such a deep, personal relationship between chassidim. Even after his friend traveled to the other side of the world (and of course then the US was much further away from Europe than it is today, with modern transportation) one chossid reminds his friend that he is still thinking about him, cares for him, and worries about his feelings of loneliness in not having other chassidim with whom to interact and from whom to draw inspiration, and reminds him of their pact to maintain their friendship despite the vast distance between them. He also subtly reminds him to stay on guard against foreign influences in his new place of residence.


If only chassidim of today would learn from the example of chassidim of earlier generations in the way chassidim should learn to establish deep, lasting friendships with one another, and truly care for the material and spiritual welfare of one another. This would provide them with tremendous strength in their Avodah, and thus automatically forestall many problems. Of course, this type of chassidishe friendship is just as necessary for girls and women to establish among themselves.

Unfortunately, at least in my own small experience, for many this type of relationship is sorely lacking. Moreover, there is often a sense of aloofness, loneliness, “every man for himself,” and indifference even when one is in the company of other chassidim with whom one is acquainted from the same community. I’m not saying that there aren’t still warm chassidim; there are definitely many, but sadly they are rarer, as are friendships of the kind described above.

The only way to change this situation is through conscious effort. It simply won’t happen on its own. Our Sages say K’nei lecho choveir—“acquire for yourself a friend” (Avos 1:2). I.e., one must actively pursue a friend in order to have one. For this one must search, because various people may not be suitable candidates, whether because of a personality clash, or because they do not qualify as peers, whether because they are on a much lower level than oneself or because they are on a much higher level than oneself.

Yet we have been assured, “if you toil, you will find.”

Sunday, December 7, 2008

What should Chassidim be doing now?

Chassidim are like one family; the Rebbe is the father of all Chassidim, and Chassidim are his children (and this relationship exists all the more with the Shluchim, with whom the Rebbe has an extra close and personal relationship).

Thus, the Rebbe is sitting shivah now, and all Chassidim should be sitting shivah now.* So to all Chassidim, and to the Rebbe, I say:

“Ha’mokom yenacheim eschem besoich shaiar avelei tziyon ve’Yerushalayim.”



*Just to clarify for those inclined to interpret things too literally, I mean that in one’s heart, that is how one should feel.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

More on love for fellow chassidim

In the HaYom Yom of 24 Teves, the Yom Hillula of the Alter Rebbe, it is written:
אאזמו"ר שאל את הצ"צ: וואס האט דער זיידע געוואלט מיט דרכי החסידות ...
... ויענהו הצ"צ: דרכי החסידות איז, אז אלע חסידים זאלען זיין ווי איין משפחה ע"פ התורה באהבה
היום יום כד טבת
[The Previous Rebbe related:] My grandfather (the Rebbe Maharash] asked the Tzemach Tzedek: What did grandfather [the Alter Rebbe] intend with the “ways of Chassidus” ... ?


The Tzemach Tzedek answered: The “ways of Chassidus” are in order that all chassidim be like one family, with affection, as Torah teaches.


HaYom Yom, 24 Teves.
In my own words with some explanation:

What are “the ways of Chassidus”? This is a broad term that refers to various practices other than study of Chassidus emphasized as appropriate Chassidic conduct. In particular, the Previous Rebbe says (Likkutei Dibburim, Vol. 3, pp. 848-850) that the ways of Chassidus include Avodas HaTefillah, attending regular farbrengens, singing Niggunim, and telling stories of chassidim and of Rebbeim. It would seem to me that minhogei (customs of) Chabad also fall under this rubric.

The Rebbe Maharash says in the above HaYom Yom that the Alter Rebbe’s intent in establishing the various ways of Chassidus was a yet deeper goal, namely to unite chassidim through these practices, bringing them to a deep love for one another, “like one family.” The analogy with a family appears clear: All chassidim are like children of the Rebbe, their father.


In more practical terms:



1. It is not remarkable that a farbrengen is related to developing ahavas Yisrael and ahavas chassidim, for a farbrengen necessarily involves relating to others. The chiddush here appears to be that Avodah according to Chassidus should not be exclusively self-focused. There should be a sense that engaging in this activity, although it may not directly involve others, should bring one to a deeper identification with all fellow chassidim. Similarly, the act of becoming inspired from a chassidishe niggun and the like or story should be permeated with this feeling of community.

2. When one meets a fellow
chossid one should immediately feel a special affinity, a bond, a warmth, because “we are all the children of one father.” This is comparable to relating to fellow family members, where one feels a natural closeness and not a feeling one needs to consciously evoke. 



Granted, the relationship with family can and should be further enhanced through proper reflection on the nature of one’s shared bond, and the same applies to one’s relationship with fellow chassidim. Still, that is a later stage. The core of the relationship to the community of chassidei Chabad (the statement in the HaYom Yom above was said specifically regarding the Alter Rebbe, so it would seem that one cannot extrapolate that this principle is necessarily applicable when relating to members of other Chassidic circles as well) is that a natural affinity ought to exist between fellow chassidim. If this feeling is missing, G–d forbid, this is a cause for serious concern.